OpenShift vs. Kubernetes: What’s the Difference?

OpenShift vs. Kubernetes: What’s the Difference?

If asked even a year ago to forecast the most dominant technologies of 2024, it].; may not be too surprising that containerization would be among those seeing widespread adoption. Now commonplace for modern app development, organizations are faced with deciding between two leading container orchestration platforms: OpenShift and Kubernetes, each touting superior orchestration.

With both platforms vying for a share in the market, many struggle to choose one over the other. This guide seeks to untangle fact from fiction to grant you much-needed clarity for finding the right container platform to match your needs.

What is OpenShift?

OpenShift is a container platform developed by Red Hat and built on top of Kubernetes as a commercial offering for both enterprise and cloud-native applications. It provides automated tools for building, deploying, scaling, and managing containerized applications throughout the development lifecycle.

Is OpenShift Kubernetes?

While OpenShift is built on Kubernetes and leverages its core capabilities, it is more accurately described as a distribution or overlay of Kubernetes. With built-in mechanisms for container image management, introspection, and security, OpenShift simplifies Kubernetes operations for improved infrastructure automation and application portability.

How does OpenShift use Kubernetes? OpenShift takes Kubernetes’ basic primitives for container orchestration and expands them with additional services, integrations, and abstraction layers to deliver a full-stack platform. So, in a sense, you could say OpenShift includes and enhances Kubernetes, but it is a separate product offering in its own right with a distinct architecture and value proposition compared to Kubernetes alone.

What is Openshift Used For?

OpenShift suits organizations seeking a fully integrated platform that supports all stages of the app lifecycle. Its development-centric features help code be created, tested, and moved seamlessly between dev and production environments. Used widely for microservices, OpenShift enables continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) of modern, cloud-native applications.

Key Features of OpenShift

OpenShift packs several key features that distinguish it from standard Kubernetes:

• Integrated CI/CD Pipelines: Automate your build, test, and deploy processes effortlessly.
• Enhanced Security: OpenShift provides robust security out of the box with integrated authentication, authorization, and compliance checks.
• Developer-Friendly Tools: With a comprehensive set of tools, including a user-friendly web console and command-line interface, developers can manage their apps easily.
• Multi-Cloud Support: OpenShift can be deployed on various cloud environments, offering flexibility for hybrid and multi-cloud strategies.

OpenShift’s robust feature set makes it an attractive choice for enterprises seeking an all-in-one platform that simplifies application deployment and management.

What is Kubernetes?

Kubernetes (often abbreviated as K8s) is an open-source system originally created by Google to automate deploying, scaling, and operating application containers across clusters of hosts. It aims to provide portable infrastructure for applications by handling scheduling, monitoring, health checking, and load balancing of containers at scale. Kubernetes supports numerous hosting platforms and has become widely adopted for modern application architectures.

What is Kubernetes Used For?

Businesses typically use Kubernetes to automate the deployment, operations, and scaling of containerized applications. It allows balancing and scheduling containers across clusters to efficiently utilize the infrastructure and ensure high availability of applications and services. Kubernetes is also useful for open innovation through an active developer community and integrations with various tools.

Key Features of Kubernetes

Kubernetes packs several core features that have made it a leader in container orchestration:

• Scalability: Automatically scale applications up or down based on demand.
• Self-Healing: Kubernetes ensures your applications are running smoothly by automatically restarting failed containers and replacing them when necessary.
• Load Balancing: Efficiently distributes network traffic to ensure your applications are responsive and reliable.
• Extensibility: Thanks to its open-source nature, Kubernetes supports a wide range of third-party integrations and extensions.

Kubernetes stands out for its adaptability and strong community backing, offering a flexible solution that can be tailored to meet diverse needs.

What’s the Difference Between OpenShift and Kubernetes?

The main difference between OpenShift and Kubernetes is that OpenShift is a full-featured container application platform that bundles Kubernetes core technologies with additional tools and services, while Kubernetes itself is a portable, extensible open-source system for automating application deployment and management.

Some other differences include:

Origin

Kubernetes was originally developed by Google and is now maintained by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF). OpenShift, on the other hand, is a product of Red Hat, which builds upon Kubernetes and adds enterprise-grade features.

Architecture

The OpenShift architecture includes Kubernetes along with a set of pre-configured tools, such as integrated CI/CD pipelines, monitoring, and enhanced security. Kubernetes, by itself, offers a more basic setup that requires additional configuration and third-party integrations to match OpenShift’s capabilities.

Deployment

Kubernetes can be deployed on various platforms and cloud providers. OpenShift offers more streamlined deployment options, including self-managed installations and managed cloud services like OpenShift Dedicated.

Ease of Use

OpenShift is often seen as more user-friendly, especially for developers, thanks to its intuitive web console and pre-built CI/CD pipelines. Kubernetes, though powerful, can have a steeper learning curve due to its complexity and need for extensive configuration.

Security

Both platforms prioritize security, but OpenShift includes additional security features out-of-the-box. These include stricter pod and container security policies, integrated authentication, and role-based access control (RBAC).

Support

As an open-source project, Kubernetes relies on community support and documentation. OpenShift, being a commercial product, offers enterprise-grade support and extensive documentation from Red Hat.

Networking

Kubernetes provides basic networking capabilities, while OpenShift includes more advanced software-defined networking (SDN) solutions. This allows for easier management of complex networking scenarios.

Integrations and Extensions

While both OpenShift and Kubernetes support a wide range of integrations, OpenShift provides a more seamless experience with built-in support for popular DevOps tools and services. Kubernetes excels in its extensibility but relies on the user to implement and manage these integrations.

Pricing

Kubernetes is open-source and free to use, though managed Kubernetes services from cloud providers come with associated costs. OpenShift, as a commercial product, has various pricing tiers based on deployment options and support levels.

OpenShift Pros and Cons

Like any technology, OpenShift comes with its own set of advantages and drawbacks. Let’s examine some of the pros and cons:

Pros

• Advanced developer tools and workflows.
• Enhanced security features for enterprise environments.
• Simplified management and operations.
• Consistent experience across different cloud providers.
• Robust support and documentation from Red Hat.

Cons

• More expensive than standard Kubernetes.
• Less flexibility in terms of customization compared to Kubernetes.
• Vendor lock-in concerns with the Red Hat ecosystem.

As such, OpenShift’s integrated features and enterprise-focused approach offer a comprehensive solution for managing containerized applications. However, its commercial nature might be a drawback for individuals/organizations seeking a fully open-source solution.

Kubernetes Pros and Cons

Kubernetes, as the foundation for many container orchestration platforms, also has its strengths and weaknesses:

Pros

• Highly flexible and customizable.
• Large, active community and ecosystem.
• Wide range of deployment options.
• Cloud-agnostic architecture.
• Continuous innovation and feature development.

Cons

• Steeper learning curve for beginners.
• Less out-of-the-box functionality compared to OpenShift.
• Security features may require additional configuration.

In brief, Kubernetes provides a highly flexible and customizable platform with a vibrant community, making it ideal for organizations that value adaptability and have the technical expertise to manage a more complex system. However, it may require more initial setup and configuration compared to OpenShift.

OpenShift vs. Kubernetes: Real-World Use Cases

While understanding the features and differences between OpenShift and Kubernetes is essential, seeing how these platforms are used in the real world can provide more context and clarity. Both have been adopted by numerous organizations across different industries, each leveraging the platforms to solve unique challenges.

OpenShift Use Cases

• Telecommunications: Companies like T-Mobile use OpenShift to manage and scale their microservices architecture, enabling them to rapidly develop and deploy new customer-facing features.
• Finance: Financial institutions rely on OpenShift for secure, scalable environments that meet stringent regulatory compliance requirements while supporting high-frequency trading applications.
• Healthcare: OpenShift helps healthcare providers develop and deploy secure applications that can handle sensitive patient data while ensuring compliance with healthcare regulations like HIPAA.

These use cases demonstrate OpenShift’s strength in industries with complex regulatory requirements, high-security needs, and demands for rapid innovation. Its integrated approach and enterprise-ready features make it a go-to choice for large-scale, mission-critical deployments across various sectors.

Kubernetes Use Cases

• Technology: Tech giants like Spotify use Kubernetes to manage thousands of microservices, ensuring seamless streaming experiences for millions of users worldwide.
• E-commerce: E-commerce platforms like Shopify leverage Kubernetes to scale their applications during peak shopping periods, ensuring that customers experience smooth and fast transactions.
• Gaming: Kubernetes is used by gaming companies to manage online gaming infrastructure, providing scalable and reliable environments that can handle millions of concurrent players.

These examples highlight Kubernetes’ versatility and scalability across various industries. Its ability to handle massive workloads, coupled with its flexibility and extensive ecosystem, makes it an ideal choice for companies dealing with dynamic, high-traffic environments and those requiring custom solutions.

Red Hat OpenShift vs. Kubernetes: The Evolution of Container Orchestration

As we look ahead, container orchestration continues to evolve. Here are some trends shaping the future of OpenShift, Kubernetes, and container orchestration as a whole:

Edge Computing Integration

Both OpenShift and Kubernetes are expanding their capabilities to support edge computing scenarios, enabling organizations to manage applications across distributed environments seamlessly.

OpenShift developed lightweight versions like MicroShift that are suitable for edge deployments, leveraging its enterprise features in resource-constrained environments. Kubernetes, on the other hand, saw the emergence of specialized distributions in recent years, such as K3s, designed for edge and IoT use cases.

AI and Machine Learning Enhancements

As AI and ML become integral to many applications, expect to see more AI-driven features in both platforms, from intelligent auto-scaling to predictive maintenance and enhanced security measures.

OpenShift has, for some time now, supported integration with Red Hat’s AI/ML toolkit to provide support for data science workflows. Meanwhile, Kubernetes continues seeing increased adoption of projects like Kubeflow, which simplifies the deployment of ML pipelines on Kubernetes clusters.

Serverless Computing

The integration of serverless architectures within container orchestration platforms is gaining traction, offering even greater flexibility and resource efficiency.

Kubernetes is the foundation for various serverless platforms, with projects like Knative gaining widespread adoption. OpenShift introduced OpenShift Serverless, based on Knative, to support event-driven and serverless applications.

Enhanced Developer Experience

Future updates will likely focus on improving the developer experience, with more intuitive interfaces, better CI/CD integration, and advanced debugging tools.

Multi-cloud and Hybrid Cloud Optimization

As organizations continue to adopt multi-cloud strategies, both OpenShift and Kubernetes will evolve to provide better support for managing workloads across diverse cloud environments.

As we’ve seen, OpenShift is enhancing its multi-cluster management capabilities, allowing centralized control of OpenShift clusters across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

Conversely, Kubernetes is seeing the growth of projects like Cluster API for cluster lifecycle management and Karmada (Kubernetes Armada) for multi-cluster application management.

Security and Compliance Advancements

With increasing cybersecurity threats, expect to see more robust security features, automated compliance checks, and enhanced vulnerability management tools integrated into these platforms.

As container orchestration technology matures, we’ll likely see a convergence of features between OpenShift and Kubernetes, while each platform continues to carve out its unique value proposition. Organizations will need to stay informed about these developments to make the most of their container orchestration strategies.

OpenShift vs. Kubernetes: Which One is Right for You?

Choosing between OpenShift and Kubernetes depends on your organization’s needs, resources, and goals. If you’re looking for a comprehensive, enterprise-ready solution with integrated tools and support, OpenShift might be the better choice. It’s particularly suited for large organizations with complex requirements and the need for robust security and compliance features.

On the other hand, if you value flexibility, have in-house Kubernetes expertise, or want to avoid vendor lock-in, Kubernetes might be the way to go. It’s ideal for organizations that prefer more control over their container orchestration setup and are comfortable managing the additional complexity.

Ultimately, both platforms offer powerful capabilities for container orchestration. The key is to assess your team’s skills, your infrastructure requirements, and your long-term goals to make the best decision for your organization.

Start Your Free Trial with eG Innovations

If you are contemplating OpenShift vs. Kubernetes, the one you choose will still need effective monitoring to ensure your containerized applications run at their best. At eG Innovations, we offer robust, comprehensive monitoring solutions for both OpenShift and Kubernetes environments.

Ready to take your container orchestration monitoring to the next level? Start your free trial with eG Innovations today and experience the power of our advanced monitoring and observability platform. Don’t let performance issues hold you back — empower your team with the insights they need to deliver exceptional user experiences.